SENSITIVITY OF SWEET POTATO GENOTYPES TO CLOMAZONE AND WEED INTERFERENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252018v31n211rcKeywords:
Bioethanol. Herbicide. Ipomoea batata (L.) Lam.Abstract
Sweet potato is a promising crop in Brazil due to its potential for bioenergy production. However, little information on adequate chemical weed control is found for this crop. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of clomazone on 20 genotypes of sweet potato and the sensitivity of these materials to weed interference. A field experiment was conducted using an experimental design with four blocks arranged in split-plots. The sweet potato genotypes Brazlândia-Branca, Cariru-Vermelha, Princesa, Tomba-Carro-1 and UFVJM (01, 05, 06, 07, 08, 10, 14, 23, 26, 30, 35, 42, 43, 46, 48 and 49) were grown for 180 days under three weed managements (soils treated with clomazone, mechanically weeded and with no weed control). The plots consisted of the weed control methods and the subplots consisted of the sweet potato genotypes. Phytotoxicity, branch growth and yield were evaluated. Plants grown with no weed interference had larger branch length. The highest yields were found in clomazone-treated soils. Weed interference reduced 81 to 99.7% of the yield. The less susceptible genotypes to weed interference were UFVJM07, UFVJM10 and UFVJM35, and the most sensitive were Princesa and UFVJM01. The root yield of plants under chemical weed control was similar to or greater than those with mechanical weed control in 17 of the 20 genotypes evaluated.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
AZEVEDO, A. M. et al. Desempenho agronômico e parâmetros genéticos em genótipos de batata-doce. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, v. 33, n. 1, p. 84-90, 2015.
BAEYENS, J. K. et al. Challenges and opportunities in improving the production of bio-ethanol. Progress in Energy and Combustion, Stanford, v. 47, n. 3, p. 60-88, 2015.
BOVELL-BENJAMIN, A. C. Sweet Potato: A Review of its Past, Present, and Future Role in Human Nutrition. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, Valencia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 1-59, 2007.
CRUZ, C. D.; CARNEIRO, P. C. S. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 2. ed. Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2006. 585 p.
DEMIRBAS, A. Tomorrow’s biofuels: Goals and hopes. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, Laramie, v. 39, n. 7, p. 673-679, 2017.
EL SHEIKHA, A. F.; RAY, R. C. Potential Impacts of Bio-processing of Sweet Potato: Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Amherst, v. 57, n. 3, p. 455-471, 2017.
E.W.R.C. Report of 3rd and 4rd meetings of E.W.R.C. Cittee of methods in weed research. Weed Research, Bachlaan, v. 4, n. 1, p. 88, 1964.
FIORINI, C. V. A. et al. Agrupamento de curvas de progresso de requeima em tomateiro originado de cruzamento interespecífico. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 45, n. 2, p. 1095-1101, 2010.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAO. FAOSTAT. Disponível em: <http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor>. Acesso em: 22 de set. 2016.
GIANESSI, P. L. The Increasing Importance of Herbicides in Worldwide Crop Production. Pest Management Science, Oxford, v. 69, n. 10, p. 1099-1105, 2013.
HARKER, K. N.; O'DONOVAN, J. T. Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management. Weed Technology, Lawrence, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2013.
HARRISON JR. H. F.; JACKSON, D. M. Response of two sweet potato cultivars to weed interference. Crop Protection, Queensland, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1291-1296, 2011.
LAREO, C. et al. Evaluation of sweet potato for fuel bioethanol production: hydrolysis and fermentation. SpringerPlus, Heidelberg, v. 2, n. 493, p. 1-11, 2013.
LAURINDO, B. S. et al. Seleção de acessos de tomateiro resistentes à pinta-preta pela análise de agrupamento das curvas de progresso da doença. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 50, n. 4, p. 106-114, 2015.
LUGO-TORRES, M. L. L.; DÍAZ, M. Weed control in sweet potato. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, Bayamón, v. 91, n. 3-4, p. 1-11, 2007.
MANTOVANI, E. C. et al. Eficiência no uso da água de duas cultivares de batata-doce em resposta a lâminas de irrigação. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, v. 31, n. 2, p. 602-606, 2013.
MARTINS, E. C. A. et al. Genetic diversity in sweet potato in tocantins. Bioscience Journal, Uberlândia, v. 30, n. 2, p. 429-435, 2014.
MEYERS, S. L. et al. Herbicide-Based Weed Management Programs for Palmer Amaranth in Sweetpotato. Weed Technology, Lawrence, v. 27, n. 2, p. 331-340, 2013.
OLATUNDE, G. O. et al. Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method. Food and Sciente Nutrition, Leeds, v. 4, n. 4, p. 623–635, 2016.
RAVI, V.; SARAVANAN, R. Crop Physiology of Sweetpotato. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Sciente and Biotecnology, Thiruvananthapuram, v. 6, s/n., p. 17-29, 2012.
SCHWEINBERGER, C. M. et al. Ethanol production from sweet potato: The effect of ripening, comparison of two heating methods, and cost analysis. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Edmonton, v. 94, n. 4, p. 716-724, 2016.
SHANER, D. L. Herbicide Handbook. 10. ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America, 2014. 349 p.
VEASEY, E. A. et al. Genetic diversity in Brazilian sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., Solanales, Convolvulaceae) landraces assessed with microsatellite markers. Genetic and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto, v. 31, n. 3, p. 725-733, 2008.
BAEYENS, J. K. et al. Challenges and opportunities in improving the production of bio-ethanol. Progress in Energy and Combustion, Stanford, v. 47, n. 3, p. 60-88, 2015.
BOVELL-BENJAMIN, A. C. Sweet Potato: A Review of its Past, Present, and Future Role in Human Nutrition. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, Valencia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 1-59, 2007.
CRUZ, C. D.; CARNEIRO, P. C. S. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 2. ed. Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2006. 585 p.
DEMIRBAS, A. Tomorrow’s biofuels: Goals and hopes. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, Laramie, v. 39, n. 7, p. 673-679, 2017.
EL SHEIKHA, A. F.; RAY, R. C. Potential Impacts of Bio-processing of Sweet Potato: Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Amherst, v. 57, n. 3, p. 455-471, 2017.
E.W.R.C. Report of 3rd and 4rd meetings of E.W.R.C. Cittee of methods in weed research. Weed Research, Bachlaan, v. 4, n. 1, p. 88, 1964.
FIORINI, C. V. A. et al. Agrupamento de curvas de progresso de requeima em tomateiro originado de cruzamento interespecífico. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 45, n. 2, p. 1095-1101, 2010.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAO. FAOSTAT. Disponível em: <http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor>. Acesso em: 22 de set. 2016.
GIANESSI, P. L. The Increasing Importance of Herbicides in Worldwide Crop Production. Pest Management Science, Oxford, v. 69, n. 10, p. 1099-1105, 2013.
HARKER, K. N.; O'DONOVAN, J. T. Recent Weed Control, Weed Management, and Integrated Weed Management. Weed Technology, Lawrence, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2013.
HARRISON JR. H. F.; JACKSON, D. M. Response of two sweet potato cultivars to weed interference. Crop Protection, Queensland, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1291-1296, 2011.
LAREO, C. et al. Evaluation of sweet potato for fuel bioethanol production: hydrolysis and fermentation. SpringerPlus, Heidelberg, v. 2, n. 493, p. 1-11, 2013.
LAURINDO, B. S. et al. Seleção de acessos de tomateiro resistentes à pinta-preta pela análise de agrupamento das curvas de progresso da doença. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, v. 50, n. 4, p. 106-114, 2015.
LUGO-TORRES, M. L. L.; DÍAZ, M. Weed control in sweet potato. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, Bayamón, v. 91, n. 3-4, p. 1-11, 2007.
MANTOVANI, E. C. et al. Eficiência no uso da água de duas cultivares de batata-doce em resposta a lâminas de irrigação. Horticultura Brasileira, Brasília, v. 31, n. 2, p. 602-606, 2013.
MARTINS, E. C. A. et al. Genetic diversity in sweet potato in tocantins. Bioscience Journal, Uberlândia, v. 30, n. 2, p. 429-435, 2014.
MEYERS, S. L. et al. Herbicide-Based Weed Management Programs for Palmer Amaranth in Sweetpotato. Weed Technology, Lawrence, v. 27, n. 2, p. 331-340, 2013.
OLATUNDE, G. O. et al. Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method. Food and Sciente Nutrition, Leeds, v. 4, n. 4, p. 623–635, 2016.
RAVI, V.; SARAVANAN, R. Crop Physiology of Sweetpotato. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Sciente and Biotecnology, Thiruvananthapuram, v. 6, s/n., p. 17-29, 2012.
SCHWEINBERGER, C. M. et al. Ethanol production from sweet potato: The effect of ripening, comparison of two heating methods, and cost analysis. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Edmonton, v. 94, n. 4, p. 716-724, 2016.
SHANER, D. L. Herbicide Handbook. 10. ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America, 2014. 349 p.
VEASEY, E. A. et al. Genetic diversity in Brazilian sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., Solanales, Convolvulaceae) landraces assessed with microsatellite markers. Genetic and Molecular Biology, Ribeirão Preto, v. 31, n. 3, p. 725-733, 2008.
Downloads
Published
06-04-2018
Issue
Section
Agronomy
License
Os Autores que publicam na Revista Caatinga concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Os Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY, para todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde estiver identificado, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista, sem fins comerciais.
b) Os Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Os Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
