Spatiotemporal variation of deforestation in the Piauí Caatinga under a panel and machine learning approach

Authors

  • Eduardo Ganassoli Graduate Program in Forest and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-2698
  • Aldemir Lucena Junior Graduate Program in Forest and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9304-3875
  • Igor Eloi Silva Machado Graduate Program in Plant Production, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-1984
  • Jader Nunes Cachoeira Center for Environmental Monitoring and Fire Management, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-5431
  • Olavo da Costa Leite Secretaria da Educação do Estado do Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8959-0064
  • Marcos Giongo Graduate Program in Forest and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Gurupi, TO, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1613-6167

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252026v3915548rc

Keywords:

Spatial autocorrelation. Fixed effects. MapBiomas. PRODES. Random Forest.

Abstract

The Piauí Caatinga has shown a marked rise in deforested area in recent years, but the factors associated with this dynamic remain poorly investigated under a spatiotemporal approach at the municipal scale. This study identified the factors associated with the spatiotemporal variation of deforestation in the biome across 140 municipalities of Piauí state between 2017 and 2024, integrating fixed-effects panel regression (FE), a spatial autoregressive model (SAR), and Random Forest (RF), based on deforestation data (PRODES/INPE), land use (MapBiomas), socioeconomic indicators (IBGE), rural credit (SICOR/BACEN), and protected areas (CNUC/MMA). The time series revealed a 105.3% increase in mean annual deforested area from 2021 onward, without statistically significant confirmation of either a trend (Mann-Kendall) or a change point (Pettitt) at the 5% level. Moran's index confirmed significant spatial dependence, intensified in the post-2021 period. The FE model identified agricultural land-use mosaics as the strongest correlate of intramunicipal temporal variation (β = 1.032; p < 0.001), a result potentially confounded by overlap with the PRODES response variable, whereas the SAR revealed significant spatial dependence (Rho = 0.294; p < 0.001) and associations of productive-pressure and infrastructure variables not captured by the FE. Random Forest, under municipality-grouped cross-validation, explained 50.98% of the variance in deforestation, identifying pasture, cattle herd size, distance to hydrography, and protected area coverage as additional structural predictors. The results evidence methodological complementarity among the three approaches and point to land-use conversion as the main correlate of deforestation in the biome, supporting the territorial prioritization of environmental command-and-control actions.

References

ANEEL - Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica. Sistema de Informações Georreferenciadas do Setor Elétrico - SIGEL. Available at: <https://sigel.aneel.gov.br/>. Access on: Feb. 18, 2026.

ANSELIN, L. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27: 93-115, 1995.

BIVAND, R.; PIRAS, G. spatialreg: spatial regression analysis. R package version 1.2-1, 2021. Available at: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=spatialreg>. Access on: Feb. 1, 2026.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima. Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento e das Queimadas na Caatinga (PPCaatinga). Brasília, DF: MMA, 2024. Available at: <https://dados.mma.gov.br/dataset/plano-de-acao-para-a-prevencao-e-controle-do-desmatamento-e-das-queimadas-na-caatinga-2024-2027>. Access on: Mar. 1, 2026.

CABALLERO, C. B. et al. Transformation of Brazil's biomes: the dynamics and fate of agriculture and pasture expansion into native vegetation. Science of the Total Environment, 896: 166323, 2023.

CROISSANT, Y.; MILLO, G. Panel data econometrics in R: the plm package. Journal of Statistical Software, 27: 1-43, 2008.

DIAS, F. et al. Predicting the pulse of the Amazon: machine learning insights into deforestation dynamics. Journal of Environmental Management, 362: 121359, 2024.

ESPINDOLA, G. M. et al. Cropland expansion as a driver of land-use change: the case of Cerrado-Caatinga transition zone in Brazil. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23: 17146-17160, 2021.

FARIA, W. R. et al. The relationship between rural credit policy and deforestation: evidence from Brazil. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 27: 231-263, 2025.

FRANÇA ROCHA, W. J. S. et al. Towards uncovering three decades of LULC in the Brazilian drylands: Caatinga biome dynamics (1985–2019). Land, 13: 1250, 2024.

GILBERT, R. O. Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1987. 320 p.

GONÇALVES-SOUZA, D. et al. The role of protected areas in maintaining natural vegetation in Brazil. Science Advances, 7: eabh2932, 2021.

IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Downloads: geociências. Available at: <https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/downloads-geociencias.html>. Access on: Feb. 1, 2026.

KENDALL, M. G. Rank correlation methods. 4. ed. London: Charles Griffin, 1975. 202 p.

KLINGLER, M. et al. Large-scale green grabbing for wind and solar photovoltaic development in Brazil. Nature Sustainability, 7: 747-757, 2024.

KUSCHNIG, N. et al. Spatial spillover effects from agriculture drive deforestation in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Scientific Reports, 11: 21804, 2021.

LIAW, A.; WIENER, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News, 2: 18-22, 2002.

MANN, H. B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica, 13: 245-259, 1945.

MAPBIOMAS. Módulo de Infraestrutura: Coleção 7. São Paulo: MapBiomas, 2022a. Available at: <https://brasil.mapbiomas.org/downloads/>. Access on: Feb. 1, 2026.

MAPBIOMAS. Relatório Anual do Desmatamento no Brasil: RAD 2021. São Paulo: MapBiomas, 2022b. 126 p. Available at: <https://alerta.mapbiomas.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/17/2024/03/RAD2021_Completo_FINAL_Rev1

.pdf>. Access on: Jul. 18, 2026.

MARCA, L.; ALVIM, A. M. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: an analysis of spatial interactions between economic and demographic factors. Environment, Development and Sustainability, s/v.: 1-31, 2025.

MORAN, P. A. P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37: 17-23, 1950.

PETTITT, A. N. A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28: 126-135, 1979.

PLOTON, P. et al. Spatial validation reveals poor predictive performance of large-scale ecological mapping models. Nature Communications, 11: 4540, 2020.

REFATI, D. C. et al. Influence of drought and anthropogenic pressures on land use and land cover change in the Brazilian semiarid region. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 126: 104362, 2023.

SANTOS, A. M. et al. Deforestation drivers in the Brazilian Amazon: assessing new spatial predictors. Journal of Environmental Management, 294: 113020, 2021.

SEN, P. K. Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63: 1379-1389, 1968.

TRIGUEIRO, W. R.; NABOUT, J. C.; TESSAROLO, G. Uncovering the spatial variability of recent deforestation drivers in the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Environmental Management, 275: 111243, 2020.

TURKOVSKA, O. et al. Land-use impacts of Brazilian wind power expansion. Environmental Research Letters, 16: 024010, 2021.

ZANELLA, L. et al. How well does random forest analysis model deforestation and forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest? Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 24: 529-549, 2017.

Downloads

Published

27-10-2026

Issue

Section

Scientific Article