EFFECT OF ECOBIOMETRIC VARIABLES IN COELOMIC CAVITY ORGANS IN RED-TAILED BOAS

  • Rafael Santos Andrade Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia - UFRA Instituto da Saúde e Produção Animal - ISPA
  • Sheila Canevese Rahal Programa de Pós-graduação em Animais Selvagens - UNESP/FMVZ
  • Ednaldo Silva Filho Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde e Produção Animal na Amazônia – UFRA.
  • Maria Eduarda Andrade Bastos Moutinho Conceição Programa de Pós-graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária – Unesp/FCAV.
  • Marcus Antônio Rossi Feliciano Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária – Unesp/FCAV.
  • Dárcio Ítalo Alves Teixeira Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias – UECE.
  • Frederico Ozanan Barros Monteiro Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde e Produção Animal na Amazônia – UFRA.

Resumo

B-mode ultrasound employment in snakes is a challenge because the anatomy is differentiated in relation to birds and mammals. Thus, the present study aimed to describe the topography and ultrasonographic characteristics of the liver, gallbladder, spleen, kidneys, and conduct a comparison of measurements and biometric variables in snakes. Fifty-seven red-tail boas (Boa constrictor) were grouped according to body mass: Group A [30 snakes (15 males and 15 females) with body mass ranging from 0.8 to 2.8 kg] and Group B [27 snakes (12 males and 15 females), body mass ranging from 3 to 3.4 Kg]. Prior to imaging, the red-tail boas received a physical examination to assess for any visible lesions or damage that could compromise their overall condition. The ultrasonographic exams were performed using an ultrasound with convex (3.5 MHz), linear (7.5 MHz), and linear multi-frequency (6-18 MHz) transducers. All ultrasound parameters were performed using sagittal and transverse B-mode. Sex did not influence the biometric parameters evaluated. However, body length and body mass influenced some organs of the coelomic cavity. Ultrasonography is a useful diagnostic tool for the assessment of the snake in red-tailed boas. In addition, data reported in this study are important as a basis for ultrasound examination for other snake species.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ANDRADE, R.S., MONTEIRO, F.O.B., RIBEIRO, A.S.S., RUFFEIL, L.A.A.S. & CASTRO, P.H.G. 2012. Anatomia ultrassonográfica de fígado, baço e trato urogenital em jiboias. Rev. Ci. Agr. 55:66-73.
AUGUSTO, A.Q. 2001. Ultrasonography in South American wild animals. In. Biology, medicine, and surgery of South American wild animals. University Press, Iowa. 464-474.
BANZATO, T., RUSSO, E., FINOTTI, L., MILAN M. C., GIANESELLA, M. & ZOTTI A. 2012a. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the coelomic organs of boid snakes (Boa constrictor imperator, Python regius, Python molurus molurus, and Python curtus). Am. J. Vet. Res. 73:634-645.
BANZATO, T., RUSSO, E., FINOTTI, L. & ZOTTI A. 2012b. Development of a technique for contrast radiographic examination of the gastrointestinal tract in ball pythons (Python regius). Am. J. Vet. Res.73:996-1001.
BANZATO, T., HELLEBUYCK, T., VAN CAELENBERG A., SAUNDERS, J.M. & ZOTTI, A. 2013. A review of diagnostic imaging of snakes and lizards. Vet Rec. 173:43-49.
CANNY, C. 1998. Gross Anatomy and Imaging of the Avian and Reptilian Urinary System. Sem. Avian Exotic Pet. Med. 7: 72-80.
CONCEIÇÃO, M. E., MONTEIRO, F. O., ANDRADE, R. S., MARGALHO, V. E., FILHO, E. S., MONTEIRO, M. V., CASTRO, P. H., STONE, A., RAHAL, S. C. & MELCHERT, A. 2014. Effect of biometric variables on two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements in the red-tailed boa (Boa constrictor constrictor). J. Zoo Wildl Med.45:672-7.
ISAZA, R., ACKERMAN, N. & JACOBSON, E.L. 1993a. Ultrasound imaging of the celomic structures in the Boa constrictor. Vet. Rad. US. 34:445-450.
ISAZA, R., ACKERMAN, N. & SCHUMACHER, J. 1993b. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver-biopsy in snakes. Vet. Rad. US. 34:452-454.
JACOBSON, E.R. 2007. Infections diseases and pathology of reptiles color atlas and text. CRC Press, Florida. 11-15.
MATIAS, N.R., ALVES, M.L.M., ARAUJO, M.L. & JUNG, D.M.H. 2011. Variação morfométrica em Bothropoides jararaca (Serpentes, Viperidae) no Rio Grande do Sul. Iheringia, Sér. Zool. 101:275-282.
MESQUITA, D.O. & BRITES, V.L.C. 2003. Aspectos taxonômicos e ecológicos de uma população de Bothrops alternatus Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 (serpentes, viperidae) das regiões do Triângulo e Alto Paranaíba, Minas Gerais. Biol. Geral Exper. 3:33-38.
NAVARRE, B. J. S., 2006. Common procedures in reptiles and amphibians. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Exo.t Anim. Pract. 9:237-267.
NETO, F. C. P., GUERRA, P. C., COSTA, F. B., ARAÚJO, A. V. C., MIGLINO, M. A., BOMBONATO, P. P., VULCANO, L. C. & ALVEL, F. R. 2009. Ultra-sonografia do fígado, aparelho renal e reprodutivo de Jiboia (Boa constrictor). Pesq. Vet. Bras. 29:317-321.
O’MALLEY, B. 2005. Clinical anatomy and physiology of exotic species. Saunders Elsevier, London. 77-93.
PIZZATTO, L., ALMEIDA-SANTOS, S.M. & MARQUES, O.A.V. 2007. Biologia reprodutiva das serpentes brasileiras. In: Herpetologia no Brasil. Primeira Ed. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil, 201-221.
SCHILDGER, B., CASARES, M. & KRAMER, M., 1994. Technique of ultrasonography in lizards, snakes and chelonians. Sem. Avian Exotic Pet. Med. 3:147-155.
SILVA, L.H.R. 2008. Anatomia descritiva e comparativa do sistema urinário de Crotalus durissus Linnaeus, 1758, Bothrops neuwiedi Wagler, 1824 e B. moojeni Hoge, 1965 (Ophidia,Viperidae). Dissertação de Mestrado em Biologia Animal. Universidade de Brasília. 72p.
STAHLSCHMIDT, Z., BRASHEARS, J. & DENARDO, D. 2011. The use of ultrasonography to assess reproductive investment and output in pythons. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 103:772-778.
STETTER, M.D. 2006. Ultrasonography. In: Reptile medicine and surgery. Second Ed. Saunders Elsevier. 665–674.
Publicado
2016-05-09
Seção
Original Articles / Artigos de Pesquisa