Glyphosate application using a RPA with different spray nozzles and flight heights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252026v3912922rcKeywords:
Application technology. Unmanned aerial vehicle. Drone. Efficacy. Droplet deposition. Weeds.Abstract
Conventional herbicide application methods can be inefficient, and remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) provide a viable alternative. This study evaluated application quality and weed control efficacy using an RPA and an electric backpack sprayer. A randomized block design with eight replications was used. Treatments consisted of two spray nozzle types (standard flat fan and air-induction flat fan) and two RPA flight heights (3.0 and 4.0 m), plus an untreated control and a standard treatment with a backpack sprayer. The spray mixture contained water, brilliant blue dye, glyphosate, and an adjuvant. RPA treatments achieved higher spray quality on the weed canopy and reduced soil losses compared with the backpack sprayer. Both methods resulted in effective weed control at 21 days after application, particularly the RPA treatments with flat fan nozzles at 3.0 and 4.0 m flight heights. RPA equipped with flat fan nozzles at a 3.0 m flight height achieved weed control efficacy equivalent to that of the electric backpack sprayer (98.5%), demonstrating that RPA technology represents a viable alternative for total-area weed management.
References
AHMAD, F. et al. Effect of operational parameters of UAV sprayer on spray deposition pattern in target and off-target zones during outer field weed control application. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 172: 105350, 2020.
ALVARES, C. A. et al. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22: 711-728, 2013.
BARROSO, A. A. M.; MURATA, A. T. Matologia: estudos sobre plantas daninhas. 1. ed. Jaboticabal, SP: Fábrica da Palavra, 2021. 547 p.
BHERING, L. Rbio: A tool for biometric and statistical analysis using the R platform. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 17: 187-190, 2017.
BLANK, L.; ROZENBERG, G.; GAFNI, R. Spatial and temporal aspects of weeds distribution within agricultural fields – A review. Crop Protection, 172: 106300, 2023.
CARNEIRO, R. P. et al. Variation of glyphosate spray volume in the drying of ground cover plants with an unmanned aerial vehicle. Crop Protection, 181: 106694, 2024.
CHEN, G. Q. et al. Double-spraying with different routes significantly improved control efficacies of herbicides applied by unmanned aerial spraying system: a case study with rice herbicides. Crop Protection, 167: 106203, 2023.
CHEN, P. et al. Optimization of spraying quality and drift risk in unmanned aerial spraying systems (UASS) based on Multi-Gradient droplet size control. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 244: 111481, 2026.
CRAUSE, D. H. et al. Droplet deposition of leaf fertilizers applied by an unmanned aerial vehicle in Coffea canephora plants. Agronomy, 13: 1506, 2023.
CUNHA, J. P. A. R.; SILVA, M. R. A. Spray deposition from a remotely piloted aircraft on the corn crop. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 54: e20217862, 2023.
DAS, T. K. et al. Herbicides use in crop production: An analysis of cost-benefit, non-target toxicities and environmental risks. Crop Protection, 181: 106691, 2024.
GUO, H. et al. Application of machine learning method to quantitatively evaluate the droplet size and deposition distribution of the UAV spray nozzle. Applied Sciences, 10: 1759, 2020.
ISO - International Organization for Standardization. Equipment for Crop Protection – Methods for Field Measurements of Spray Drift. ISO 22866. International Organization for Standardization, p. 1-17, 2005.
JEEVAN, N. et al. Effect of different spray volumes on deposition characteristics of a fuel-operated UAV sprayer using herbicides in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93: 720-725, 2023.
KUMAR, S. et al. Droplet distribution and weed control efficacy of unmanned aerial vehicle sprayer in wheat crop. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 59: 126-136, 2022.
LOPES, L. D. L. et al. Control of Urochloa decumbens using glyphosate applied by remotely piloted aircraft and ground sprayer with different spray nozzles. Plants, 13: 757, 2024.
MA, J. et al. Visualization Techniques for Spray Monitoring in Unmanned Aerial Spraying Systems: A Review. Agronomy, 16: 123, 2026.
MINGUELA, J. V.; CUNHA, J. P. A. R. Manual de aplicação de produtos fitossanitários. Viçosa, MG: Aprenda Fácil Editora, 2010. 588 p.
MODI, R. U. et al. Dynamics of spray deposition pattern with UAV‐based herbicide application for effective weed management in sugarcane crop. Pest Management Science, 2026.
PEREIRA, R. C. et al. Interaction between glyphosate and montmorillonite in the presence of artificial seawater. Heliyon, 6: e03532, 2020.
PRANASWI, D. et al. Analyzing the synergistic impact of UAV-based technology and knapsack sprayer on weed management, yield-contributing traits, and yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) for enhanced agricultural operations. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 219: 108796, 2024.
RIBEIRO, L. F. O. et al. Impact of operational parameters on droplet distribution using an unmanned aerial vehicle in a Papaya orchard. Agronomy, 13: 1138, 2023.
RIBEIRO, L. F. O.; VITÓRIA, E. L. Impact of Application Rate and Spray Nozzle on Droplet Distribution on Watermelon Crops Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Agriculture, 14: 1351, 2024.
RIBEIRO, L. F. O. et al. Droplet distribution and mitigation of occupational exposure risk in eucalyptus sprout eradication using a remotely piloted aircraft. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15: 1504608, 2025.
SHAN, C. F. et al. Effects of droplet size and spray volume parameters on droplet deposition of wheat herbicide application by using UAV. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 14: 74-81, 2021.
SOIL SURVEY STAFF. Keys to soil taxonomy. 13. ed. Washington, DC: USDA–Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2022.
VITÓRIA, E. L. et. al. Effect of flight operative height and genotypes on conilon coffee spraying using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Coffee Science, 17: e172003, 2022.
VITÓRIA, E. L. et al. Efficiency of fungicide application using an unmanned aerial vehicle and pneumatic sprayer for control of Hemileia vastatrix and Cercospora coffeicola in mountain coffee crops. Agronomy, 13: 340, 2023.
VITÓRIA, E. L. et al. Spatial Variability in the Deposition of Herbicide Droplets Sprayed Using a Remotely Piloted Aircraft. AgriEngineering, 7: 245, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Os Autores que publicam na Revista Caatinga concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Os Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY, para todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde estiver identificado, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista, sem fins comerciais.
b) Os Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Os Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
