NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION OF TILAPIA FILLETING WASTE MEAL FOR SWINE IN THE NURSERY PHASE

Authors

  • Edson Richart Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR.
  • Ricardo Vianna Nunes Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR.
  • Leandro Dalcin Castilha Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR.
  • Yolanda Lopes da Silva Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR.
  • Paulo Segatto Cella Department of Animal Science, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Dois Vizinhos, PR.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252016v29n225rc

Keywords:

Alternative feed. Energy values. Digestible amino acids.

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to determine the nutritional composition of tilapia filleting waste meal (TFWM) for pigs in the initial phase. In the first experiment, the chemical composition and the values of digestible and metabolizable energy of TFWM were determined using 10 pigs (15.10 ± 0.74 kg), distributed in cages for metabolic research (2 treatments X 5 replicates). The TFWM replaced 20% of the reference diet based on corn and soybean meal. In the second experiment, the ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids present in TFWM were determined, using chromic oxide as a marker, through the method of sacrifice, using 10 pigs (15.00 ± 0.27 kg), distributed in cages for metabolic research (2 treatments X 5 replicates). Treatments consisted of a basal diet and one without protein. In the third experiment, the performance of pigs fed diets containing different concentrations of TFWM (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20%) was evaluated. Forty pigs (15.00 ± 0.87 kg), distributed in pairs in nursery pens (5 treatments X 4 replicates) were used. The values of digestible and metabolizable energy corresponded to 3,632 and 3,260 kcal/kg, respectively. Inclusion of up to 10% TFWM in the diet of barrows from 15 to 30 kg did not affect the average daily gain and feed conversion of the animals.

Author Biographies

  • Edson Richart, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR.
    Zootecnista e Mestre em Zootecnia
  • Ricardo Vianna Nunes, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR.
    Zootecnista, Mestre e Doutor em Zootecnia. Docente da Unioeste.
  • Leandro Dalcin Castilha, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR.
    Zootecnista, Mestre e Doutorando em Zootecnia. Licenciado em Letras (Português/Inglês)
  • Yolanda Lopes da Silva, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR.
    Zootecnista, Mestre e Doutor em Zootecnia. Docente da Unioeste.
  • Paulo Segatto Cella, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Dois Vizinhos, PR.
    Zootecnista, Mestre e Doutor em Zootecnia. Docente da UTFPR.

Downloads

Published

03-05-2016

Issue

Section

Zootechnics