RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER WITH POLYMER-COATED UREA IN A CORN CROP

Authors

  • Tayene Franco Mello Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
  • Salatiér Buzetti Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
  • Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
  • Fernando Shintate Galindo Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
  • Lais Meneghini Nogueira Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252017v30n306rc

Keywords:

Zea mays L.. Coated fertilizer. Nitrogen. Improved fertilizer efficiency.

Abstract

The use of nitrogenous fertilizer coated by polymers may reduce losses caused by volatilization, thus exposing this element to plants for a longer period of time. The objective of this work was to evaluate the residual effects of nitrogen in the form of conventional urea and urea coated by polymers in the production components and grain productivity of the first and second corn crops. The experiment was conducted in Selvíria - MS in a clay-type Oxisol during the corn crops of 2011/12 and 2012. The experiment was arranged as a randomized block design with four replications, with a factorial 4 x 4 treatment arrangement as follows: 4 doses of N (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg ha-1) and 4 forms of urea (conventional urea and urea coated by three different polymers). Treatments were applied at the time of corn sowing in the first season (2010/11) and second season (2011). The residual effects of nitrogen fertilization in the corn grown in the first crop season (2011/12) and the second crop season (2012) were then assessed. The polymer-coated urea did not differ compared to the conventional urea.

Author Biographies

  • Tayene Franco Mello, Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
    Engenheira Agrônoma pela Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" FEIS/UNESP
  • Salatiér Buzetti, Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
    Professor do Departamento de Fitossanidade, Engenharia Rural e Solos da Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" FEIS/UNESP
  • Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira Filho, Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
    Professor do Departamento de Fitossanidade, Engenharia Rural e Solos da Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" FEIS/UNESP
  • Fernando Shintate Galindo, Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
    Mestre em Sistemas de Produção - Agronomia pela Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho'' FEIS/UNESP
  • Lais Meneghini Nogueira, Department of Phytosanitary, rural engineering and soils, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” Ilha Solteira, SP
    Mestre em Sistemas de Produção - Agronomia pela Faculdade de Engenharia de Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho'' FEIS/UNESP

Downloads

Published

21-03-2017

Issue

Section

Agronomy