Gas exchanges and chlorophyll fluorescence of soybean genotypes subjected to flooding stress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252024v3712468rcKeywords:
Glycine max (L.) Merr. Water stress. Abiotic stress. Water use efficiency.Abstract
The objective of this work was to evaluate the ecophysiological responses of soybean subjected to soil flooding. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with five replications. A 3 x 3 factorial scheme was used, consisting of three soybean genotypes (tolerant, sensitive and a commercial cultivar), and three water conditions (control treatment – soil was maintained at 70% of field capacity throughout the plant cycle; soil flooding for 10 days in the vegetative period + 10 days in the reproductive period; and soil flooding for 10 days only in the reproductive period). Three evaluations were carried out regarding chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange: after flooding in the vegetative period (V2); after flooding in the reproductive period (R2), and ten days after draining the water. Tolerant genotypes and sensitive genotypes experienced reductions in photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance when subjected to water stress in the reproductive stage. However, under stress in the vegetative stage, only the tolerant and sensitive genotypes reduced the actual quantum efficiency and electron transport rate, and at the moment of flooding in the reproductive stage, all had changes and did not show recovery for these variables. As for non-photochemical quenching, only the sensitive genotype increased the rate, under stress in stages V2/R2 and R2. The local commercial cultivar is more adapted to soil flooding conditions, as it shows better physiological responses to adapt to soil flooding conditions.
Downloads
References
ANTÓNIO, C. et al. Regulation of primary metabolism in response to low oxygen availability as revealed by carbon and nitrogen isotope redistribution. Plant Physiology, 170: 43-56, 2016.
ARGUS, R. E.; COLMER, T. D.; GRIERSON, P. F. Early physiological flood tolerance is followed by slow post‐flooding root recovery in the dryland riparian tree Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. refulgens. Plant, Cell & Environment, 38: 1189-1199, 2015.
BARICKMAN, T. C.; SIMPSON, C. R.; SAMS, C. E. Waterlogging causes early modification in the physiological performance, carotenoids, chlorophylls, proline, and soluble sugars of cucumber plants. Plants, 8: 1-15, 2019.
BERTOLINO, L. T.; CAINE, R. S.; GRAY, J. E. Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019, 10: 1-11, 2019.
BORELLA, J. et al. Hypoxia-driven changes in glycolytic and tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites of two nodulated soybean genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 133: 118-127, 2017.
BORELLA, J. et al. Waterlogging-induced changes in fermentative metabolism in roots and nodules of soybean genotypes. Scientia Agricola, 71: 499-508, 2014.
CARLOTO, B. W. et al. Response of Eragrostis plana and Eragrostis pilosa (L.) P. Beauv. submitted on flooded soil. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences, 42: 1-10, 2020.
DANIEL, K.; HARTMAN, S. How plant roots respond to waterlogging. Journal of Experimental Botany, 75: 511-525, 2024.
FERREIRA, D. F. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 35: 1039-1042, 2011.
GARCIA, N. et al. Waterlogging tolerance of five soybean genotypes through different physiological and biochemical mechanisms. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 172: 1-8, 2020.
HONÓRIO, A. B. M. et al. Impact of drought and flooding on alkaloid production in Annona crassiflora Mart. Horticulturae, 7: 1-14, 2021.
KAUR, G. et al. Impacts and management strategies for crop production in waterlogged or flooded soils: a review. Agronomy Journal, 112, 1475-1501, 2020.
KREUZWIESER, J.; RENNENBERG, H. Molecular and physiological responses of trees to waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Environment, 37: 2245-2259, 2014.
LEÓN, J.; CASTILLO, M. C.; GAYUBAS, B. The hypoxia-reoxygenation stress in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 72: 5841-5856, 2020.
LIAO, C. T.; LIN, C. H. Physiological adaptation of crop plants to flooding stress. Proceedings National Science Council, 25: 148-157, 2001.
LORETI, E.; PERATA, P. The many facets of hypoxia in plants. Plants, 9: 1-14, 2020.
MARCÍLIO, T. et al. Flooding and submersion-induced morphological and physiological adaptive strategies in Lonchocarpus cultratus. Aquatic Botany, 159: 1-10, 2019.
MOURTZINIS, S.; CONLEY, S. P. Delineating soybean maturity groups across the United States. Agronomy Journal, 109: 1397-1403, 2017.
NAKAMURA, M.; NOGUCHI, K. Tolerant mechanisms to O2 deficiency under submergence conditions in plants. Journal of Plant Research, 133: 343-371, 2020.
PIMENTEL, P. et al. Physiological and morphological responses of Prunus species with different degree of tolerance to long-term root hypoxia. Scientia Horticulturae, 180: 14-23, 2014.
RITCHIE, S.; HANWAY, J. J.; THOMPSON, H. E. How a soybean plant develops. Ames: Yowa State University of Science and Technology, Cooperative Extension, 1982. 20 p. (Special Report, 53).
RODRIGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ, C. M.; BRODRIBB, T. J. Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress. New Phytologist, 225: 126-134, 2020.
SATHI, K. S. et al. Screening of soybean genotypes for waterlogging stress tolerance and understanding the physiological mechanisms. Advances in Agriculture, 2022: 1-14, 2022.
SELMAR, D.; KLEINWÄCHTER, M. Influencing the product quality by deliberately applying drought stress during the cultivation of medicinal plants. Industrial Crops and Productd, 42: 558-566, 2013.
SILVA, F. G. et al. Trocas gasosas e fluorescência da clorofila em plantas de berinjela sob lâminas de irrigação. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 19: 946-952, 2015.
SOUSA, J. R. M. et al. Impacto das condições salinas e da adubação nitrogenada na produção de citros e nas trocas gasosas. Revista Caatinga, 29: 415-424, 2016.
TIAN, L. et al. Effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) Under fi eld conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 218: 250-258, 2019.
WITTMANN, F. et al. Habitat specifity, endemism and the neotropical distribution of Amazonian white‐water floodplain trees. Ecography, 36: 690-707, 2013.
ZAHRA, N. et al. Hypoxia and anoxia stress: Plant responses and tolerance mechanisms. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 207: 249-84, 2021.
ZHOU, W. et al. Plant waterlogging/flooding stress responses: From seed germination to maturation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 148: 228-236, 2020.
ZHOU, J. et al. Qualification of soybean responses to flooding stress using UAV-based imagery and deep learning. Plant Phenomics, 2021: 1-13, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Os Autores que publicam na Revista Caatinga concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Os Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY, para todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde estiver identificado, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista, sem fins comerciais.
b) Os Autores têm autorização para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Os Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
