TOMATOES USED BY INDUSTRIES HAVE TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY FOR FRESH CONSUMPTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252020v33n326rc

Keywords:

Solanum lycopersicum. Determinate growth habit. Acceptability. Consumer.

Abstract

The production of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for fresh consumption must overcome a challenge: the high production cost. The use of cultivars with determinate growth habit is an alternative to reduce costs. Thus, the objective this work was to evaluate the acceptability of tomato fruits from cultivars with determinate growth habit for fresh consumption. Seeds of 10 hybrids and one variety were grown in open field, arranged in six randomized block design, and tested for sensorial acceptability. The analyses were carried out using 50 not-trained consumers, considering their visual and sensorial preferences by affective methods and purchase intention. The hybrid Thaise grown with and without staking and the hybrid Gabrielle grown with staking had higher visual preference by the consumers, with frequency of 24%, 18%, and 22%, respectively, in the first position; and the hybrid Dominador showed higher frequency (18%) in the second and third positions; these hybrids had purchase intention above 80%. All hybrids and varieties had significant difference in the mean test at p≤0.05. The highest means found for Carrara, HM7885, Santa Cruz Kada, Asti, N901, Dominador, and Equatorial (appearance); Asti and N901 (color), Asti, Dominador, and Equatorial (aroma), and Santa Cruz Kada, Asti, Dominador, and Equatorial (flavor). Asti, Gabrielle (grown without staking), HM7885, and Equatorial had purchase intention above of 50%. The hybrids Ap533, Portinari, and Thaise grown without staking showed acceptability index lower than 70%. Plants with determinate growth habit produce fruits with acceptable visual and sensorial qualities for fresh consumption.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVARENGA, M. A. R. et al. Tomate: produção em campo, casa de vegetação e hidroponia. 2. ed. Lavras: Universitária de Lavras, 2013. 413 p.

AMERICAN OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS - AOAC. Official methods of analysis of AOAC. 19. ed. Gaitlerburg: AOAC International. 2012. 3000 p.

BORGUINI, R. G.; TORRES, E. A. F. D. Tomatoes and tomato products as dietary sources of antioxidants. Food Research International, 25: 313 325, 2009.

BRASIL. Ministério da agricultura pecuária e abastecimento. SISLEGIS - Portaria n. 85 de 2002, Regulamento técnico de identificação e qualidade para a classificação de tomate. Disponível em: <http://sistemasweb.agricultura.gov.br>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2018.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. SLEGIS - Resolução n. 466 de 2012, Pesquisa em seres humanos. Disponível em: <https://saudelegis.saude.gov.br>. Acesso em 20 jul. 2018.

BRASIL. Ministério da agricultura pecuária e abastecimento. SISLEGIS - Portaria n. 553 de 1995, Regulamento técnico MERCOSUL de identidade e Qualidade do tomate. Disponível em: <http://sistemasweb.agricultura.gov.br>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2018.

CALBO, A. G. Fisiologia pós-colheita em hortaliças, teórica e prática. In: FERREIRA, M. D. (Org.). Tecnologia pós-colheita em frutas e hortaliças. São Carlos, SP: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2011. v. 1, cap. 3, p. 69-92.

CHITARRA, M. I. F.; CHITARRA, A. B. Pós-colheita de frutos e hortaliças: fisiologia e manuseio. 2. ed. Lavras, MG: UFLA, 2005. 783 p.

DELEO, J. P. B. et al. Anuário Hortifruti Brasil Retrospectiva 2019 & Perspectiva 2020. Hortifruti Brasil, 1: 28-30, 2020.

DUTCOSKY, S. D. Análise Sensorial de Alimentos. 4. ed. Curitiba, PR: PUCPRESS, 2013. 531 p.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS - FAOSTAT. CROPS - Crop statistics. Disponível em: <http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC>. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2020.

FERREIRA, S. M. R. et al. Qualidade do tomate de mesa cultivado nos sistemas convencional e orgânico, Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 30: 224-230, 2010.

INSTITUTO ADOLFO LUTZ - IAL. Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos. Disponível em: <http://www.ial.sp.gov.br/ial/publicacoes/livros/>. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2018.

INSTITUTO PARA O FORTALECIMENTO DA AGROPECUÁRIA DE GOIÁS - IFAG. Custos de produção. Disponível em: <http://ifag.org.br/custos-de-producao>. Acesso em: 19 abri.de 2020.

KADER, A. A. et al. Composition and flavor quality of fresh quality of fresh market tomatoes as influenced by some postharvest handling procedures. Journal American Society Horticultural Science, 103: 6-13. 1978.

KADER, A. A. et al. Effect of fruit ripeness when picked on Flavor and Composition in Fresh Market Tomatoes.Journal American Society Horticultural Science, 102: 724-731, 1977.

KEMP, S. R.; HOLLOWOOD, T.; HORT, J. Sensory Evaluation: A Practical Handbook. 1. ed. West Sussex, Chichester: WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2009. 328 p.

LAWLESS, H. T.; HEYMANN, H. Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. 2. ed. New York: SPRINGER, 2010. 596 p.

MEILGAARD, M.; CIVILLE, G. V.; CARR, B. T. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 5. ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2016. 600 p.

MORAES, M. A. C. Métodos para a avaliação sensorial dos alimentos. 7. ed. Campinas, SP: UNICAMP, 1988. 93 p.

MORETTI, C. L. et al. Chemical composition and physical properties of pericarp, locule, and placental tissues of tomatoes with internal bruising. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 123: 656-660, 1998.

NASSU, R. T. Análise Sensorial de Carne: Conceitos e Recomendações. 1. ed. São Carlos, SP: EMBRAPA, 2007. 7 p. (Comunicado Técnico, 79).

PERVEEN, R. et al. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Carotenoids and Lycopenes Chemistry; Metabolism, Absorption, Nutrition, and Allied Health Claims A Comprehensive Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55: 919-929, 2015.

OMS-OLIUB, G. Metabolic characterization of tomato fruit during preharvest development, ripening, and posthaverst shelf-life. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 62: 7-16, 2011.

SIDDIQUI, M. W.; AYALA-ZAVALA, J. F.; DHUA, R. S. Genotypic variation in tomatoes affecting processing and antioxidant attributes. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 55: 1819-1835, 2015.

SOUZA, M. E. et al.Caracterização físico-química e avaliação sensorial dos frutos de bananeira. Nativa,1: 13-17, 2013.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2020

Issue

Section

Food Engineering