GRAIN YIELD OF COFFEE PLANTS FERTILIZED WITH DIFFERENT DOSES OF 20-00-20 NPK FORMULATION UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Josemar Dávila Torres Graduate Program in Environmental Sciences, Fundação Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Rolim de Moura, RO https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-8637
  • Marcelo Curitiba Espindula Agroflorestry Research Center of Rondônia, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Porto Velho, RO https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7481-9746
  • Larissa Fatarelli Bento de Araújo Graduate Program in Environmental Sciences, Fundação Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Rolim de Moura, RO https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4249-024X
  • Alaerto Luiz Marcolan Agroflorestry Research Center of Rondônia, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Porto Velho, RO https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-8368
  • Rodrigo Barros Rocha Agroflorestry Research Center of Rondônia, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Porto Velho, RO https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-5315

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252021v34n225rc

Keywords:

Coffea canephora. Nitrogen. Potassium. Fertilizer use efficiency.

Abstract

Little is known about the management of high-yield clonal Coffea canephora in the Amazonian Region, mainly for nutritional aspects and cultivation system efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different nitrogen and potassium fertilization rates on coffee grain yield and fertilizer use efficiency of C. canephora trees. An experiment was performed at an experimental field of the Embrapa Rondônia in Porto Velho (RO), Brazil. It was carried out in a split-plot scheme with six doses of 20-00-20 NPK formulation (0; 250; 500; 1,000; 2,000; and 3,000 kg ha-1) and three years of evaluation (2014, 2015, and 2016). An interaction between fertilizer dose and crop year was observed. Fertilizer doses showed an exponential behavior, with maximum yields of 51, 114, and 79 bags ha-1 at 3,000 kg ha-1 in the crop years of 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Such a behavior impacted average and accumulated yields in the three harvest seasons. As for crop year effect within each fertilizer dose, the highest yield was reached in the second harvest after pruning for renewal of orthotropic stems. Moreover, fertilizer use efficiency by plants decreased exponentially, with the highest value at the lowest dose. Increasing doses of 20-00-20 formulation promoted an exponential increase in grain yield but decreased its use efficiency by C. canephora plants. This management also stimulated a strong biannual production.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVARES, C. A. et al. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22: 711-728, 2013.

BAZONI, P. A. et al. Production of cuttings and nutrient export by Coffea canephora in different periods in the Southwestern Amazon. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 24: 162-169, 2020.

COVRE, A. M. et al. Nutrient accumulation in bean and fruit from irrigated and non-irrigated Coffea canephora cv. Conilon. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 28: 402-409, 2016.

CRUZ, C. D. Programa Genes: Versão 2016.6.9. 2017. Disponível em: <http://arquivo.ufv.br/dbg/genes/genes.htm>. Acesso em: 24 out. 2019.

DAMATTA, F. M. et al. Physiological and agronomic performance of the coffee crop in the context of climate change and global warming: a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66: 5264-5274, 2018.

DUBBERSTEIN, D. et al. Concentration and accumulation of macronutrients in leaf of coffee berries in the Amazon, Brazil. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 10: 701 - 710, 2016.

DUBBERSTEIN, D. et al. Influência da adubação no crescimento vegetativo de cafeeiros na Amazônia Sul Ocidental. Coffee Science, 12: 197-206, 2017.

ESPINDULA, M. C. et al. Ammonia loss from protected urea in soil under different irrigation depths. Acta Scientiarum.Agronomy, v. 43, e46764, 2021.

FERRÃO, L. F. V. et al. Comparative study of different molecular markers for classifying and establishing genetic relationships in Coffea canephora. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 299: 225-238, 2013.

GOOD, A. G.; SHRAWAT, A. K.; MUENCH, D. G. Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends in Plant Science, 9: 597-605, 2004.

MARCOLAN, A. L. et al. Cultivo dos Cafeeiros Conilon e Robusta para Rondônia. 3. ed. Porto Velho, RO: Embrapa Rondônia, 2009. 72 p. (Sistemas de Produção, 33).

MARCOLAN, A. L. et al. Manejo Nutricional. In: MARCOLAN, A. L.; ESPINDULA, M.C. (Eds). Café na Amazônia. Porto Velho, RO: Embrapa Rondônia, 2015. v. 1, cap. 8, p. 177-193.

MONTAGNON, C.; CUBRY, P.; LEROY, T. Amélioration génétique du caféier Coffea canephora Pierre: connaissances acquises, stratégies et perspectives. Cahiers Agricultures, 21: 143-153, 2012.

PARTELLI, F. L. et al. Dry matter and macronutrient accumulation in fruits of Conilon coffee with different ripening cycles. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 38: 214-222, 2014.

PINTO, C. et al. Faixas críticas de teores foliares de macronutrientes primários para cafeeiros fertirrigados no primeiro ano pós-plantio. Coffee Science, 8: 530-538, 2014.

PREZOTTI, L. C.; BRAGANÇA, S. M. Accumulation of dry mass, N, P and K in different genetic sources of Conilon coffee. Coffee Science, 8: 284-294, 2013.

RAMALHO, A. R. et al. Cultivar de cafeeiro Conilon BRS Ouro Preto: características agronômicas e agroindustriais. 1. ed. Porto Velho, RO: Embrapa Rondônia, 2014. 10 p. (Comunicado Técnico, 396).

RAMALHO, J. C. et al. Can Elevated Air [CO2] Conditions Mitigate the Predicted Warming Impact on the Quality of Coffee Bean? Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 287, 2018.

REICHARDT, K. et al. Relação entre a adubação nitrogenada e as condições hídricas do solo para um cafezal de Piracicaba, SP. Coffee Science, 4: 41-55, 2009.

RODRIGUES, W. P. et al. Stomatal and photochemical limitations of photosynthesis in coffee (Coffea spp.) plants subjected to elevated temperatures. Crop and Pasture Science, 69: 317-325, 2018.

SAKAI, E. et al. Coffee productivity and root systems in cultivation schemes with different population arrangements and with and without drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 148: 16-23, 2015.

SANTOS, H. G. et al. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5. ed. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. 356 p.

SECRETARIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO AMBIENTAL - SEDAM. Rede de Monitoramento. Disponível em: < http://www.coreh.sedam.ro.gov.br/meteorologia/>. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2020.

SILVA, D. R. et al. Compatibility Test and Agronomic Performance of Coffee Genotypes (Coffea canephora Pierre ex Froehner) in the State of Rondônia, Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11: 162-170, 2019.

SILVEIRA, J. et al. Densidade populacional de cultivares na produtividade e qualidade de grãos de café arábica. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 48: 358-363, 2018.

SOUZA, F. F. et al. Molecular diversity in Coffea canephora germplasm conserved and cultivated in Brazil. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 13: 221-227, 2013.

STARLING, L. C. T. et al. Variability and nutritional balance among genotypes of Coffea canephora (Rubiaceae) in drought versus adequate water supply. Genetics and Molecular Research, 17: 1-13 2018.

SYSTAT SOFTWARE Inc - SSI. Sigma Plot for Windows version 10. 2006. Disponível em: < https://systatsoftware.com/products/sigmaplot/>. Acesso em: 24 ago. de 2018.

VALADARES, S. V. et al. Produtividade e bienalidade da produção de cafezais adensados, sob diferentes doses de N e K. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 48, 296-303, 2013.

VERDIN FILHO, A. C. et al. Conilon coffee yield using the programmed pruning cycle and different cultivation densities. Coffee Science, 9: 489-494, 2014.

VERDIN FILHO, A. C. et al New management technology for arabica coffee: the cyclic pruning program for arabica coffee. Coffee Science, 11: 475-483, 2016.

Downloads

Published

10-05-2021

Issue

Section

Technical Note