CONTROL OF VOLUNTEER CORN AS A FUNCTION OF LIGHT RESTRICTION PERIODS AFTER DIQUAT APPLICATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252022v35n206rc

Keywords:

Bipyridyliums. Chlorophyll fluorescence. Oxidative stress. Photosystem I inhibiting herbicides. Zea mays L.

Abstract

The action of photosystem I (PSI) inhibiting herbicides depends on light to cause oxidative stress in plants. However, their translocation is inhibited due to their rapid action in the presence of light. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the herbicide diquat for control of corn plants subjected to different periods of absence of light after application. Two experiments (field and greenhouse) were conducted, applying the herbicide diquat (200 g a.i. ha-1) to maize plants at stage V4. The plants were subjected to different periods of absence of light after diquat application: 0; 1; 2; 3; 4; 5 and 6 hours. A treatment without herbicide application was used as a control. The control (%) and biomass of corn plants were evaluated in both experiments, and photosynthetic activity and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation in leaves were evaluated in the greenhouse experiment. The results showed that diquat needs at least 5 hours of absence of light after application to fully control corn plants. The plants recovered when using shorter periods (4 hours or less) of darkness, and injuries were restricted to points where the herbicide had contact with the plant. The ability of plants to recover was related to the higher photosynthetic activity and oxidative stress induction due to early light exposure. Thus, the lower production of H2O2 in plants kept in the dark for longer periods after herbicide application allows the translocation of the herbicide to meristems, which prevents regrowth of corn plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALEXIEVA, V. et al. The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24: 1337-1344, 2001.

ALMS, J. et al. Yield loss and management of volunteer corn in soybean. Weed Technology, 30: 254-262, 2016.

ANVISA - Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução de diretoria colegiada – RDC nº 190, de 30 novembro de 2017. 2017.

BAKER, N. R. Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59: 89–113, 2008.

BASI, S.; NOGA, G.; HUNSCHE, M. Relevance of the deposit structure for the uptake and bio-efficacy of diquat, as monitored by the spatially resolved chlorophyll fluorescence. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 107: 218-225, 2013.

BRIAN, R. C. Darkness and the activity of diquat and paraquat on tomato, broad bean and sugar beet. Annals of Applied Biology, 60: 77–85, 1967.

BROMILOW, R. H.; CHAMBERLAIN, K.; EVANS, A. A. Physicochemical aspects of phloem translocation of herbicides. Weed Science, 38: 305-314, 1990.

CALDERBANK, A.; SLADE, P. Diquat and Paraquat. In: KEARNY, P. C.; KAUFMAN, D. D. (Ed.). Herbicides: chemistry, degradation, and mode of action. New York, 1976. p. 501-540.

CARVALHO, S. J. P. et al. Control of glyphosate-resistant volunteer maize using ACCase inhibiting herbicides. Revista Caatinga, 32: 575-580, 2019.

COBB, A. H.; READE, J. P. H. Herbicides and plant phisiology. 2. ed. Hoboken, 2010. 286 p.

CTNBio - Comissão Técnica Nacional de Biosegurança. Parecer Técnico Nº 4763/2015 - Relatório de biossegurança do milho DAS-40278-9 x NK603. Outubro 2015. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/gmfp/docs/Parecer%20Final%204763Dow.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2020.

DEVINE, M. D.; DUKE, S. O.; FEDTKE, C. Physiology of herbicide action. Englewood Cliffs: PRENTICE HALL, 1993. 441 p.

GITSOPOULOS, T. K.; DAMALAS, C. A.; GEORGOULAS, I. Improving diquat efficacy on grasses by adding adjuvants to the spray solution before use. Planta Daninha, 32: 355-360, 2014.

HAWKES, T. R. Mechanisms of resistance to paraquat in plants. Pest Management Science, 70: 1316-1323, 2014.

HESS, F. D. Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Science, 48: 160-170, 2000.

MONTGOMERY, G. B. et al. Effect of time of day of application of 2,4-D, dicamba, glufosinate, paraquat, and saflufenacil on horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control. Weed Technology, 31: 550-556, 2017.

NORSWORTHY, J. K.; SMITH, K. L.; GRIFFITH, G. Evaluation of combinations of paraquat plus photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides for controlling failed stands of maize (Zea mays). Crop Protection, 30: 307-310, 2011.

PETTER, F. A. et al. Management of volunteer plants in cultivation systems of soybeans, corn and cotton resistant to glyphosate. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 15: 58-66, 2016.

PITELLI, R. A. et al. Doses e horário de aplicação do diquat no controle de Eichhornia crassipes. Planta Daninha, 29: 269-277, 2011.

PITELLI, R. A. O termo planta-daninha. Planta Daninha, 33: 622-623, 2015.

PURI, A. et al. Effect of the foliar application of diquat herbicide on selected natural area and field crop species. Weed Biology and Management, 8: 133-138, 2008.

R CORE TEAM (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/.

RODRIGUES, B. N.; ALMEIDA, F. S. Guia de herbicidas. 7. ed. Londrina, 2018. 764 p.

SHANER, D. L. Herbicide handbook. 10. ed. Lawrence, 2014. 513 p.

SHAUCK, T. C. et al. Corn (Zea mays) harvest inefficiencies and potential for volunteer corn. Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society, Las Cruces, NM: NORTH CENTRAL WEED SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2010. v. 65.

TAHMASEBI, B. K. et al. Multiple resistance evolution in bipyridylium-resistant Epilobium ciliatum after recurrent selection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 2018.

WRIGHT, T. R. et al. Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107: 20240–20245, 2010.

Downloads

Published

04-04-2022

Issue

Section

Agronomy