Water deficit limits growth and yield of cowpea cultivars

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252026v3914137rc

Keywords:

Irrigation management. Irrigation depths. Evapotranspiration.

Abstract

Irrigation management is essential for applying the required amount of water to crops. This study evaluated the growth and yield of cowpea cultivars as a function of water regime. The experiment was conducted in Teresina, Piauí State, Brazil, from July to September 2022. The experimental design comprised a randomized block in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The treatments comprised five water regimes (133.80, 191.70, 249.00, 303.00, and 357.00 mm per cycle) and two cowpea cultivars (BRS Inhuma and BRS Olho Negro). Physiological characteristics, growth, and yield were also evaluated. Decreasing water regimes restricted the relative water content of the leaves, relative chlorophyll index, leaf area index, dry matter accumulation, number and size of pods, and cultivar yield. BRS Inhuma showed greater growth, dry matter accumulation, and yield but was more sensitive to decreasing water regimes. Water regimes of 311.00 and 332.08 mm per cycle maximized the yield of BRS Inhuma and BRS Olho Negro, respectively. BRS Olho Negro was more tolerant to growing conditions under water-deficit conditions, indicating that there were genetic variations among the cultivars. Therefore, identifying cowpea cultivars that are more tolerant to water deficit is fundamental to ensuring high yields in irrigated areas.

References

ADUSEI, G. et al. The variability of grain yield of some cowpea genotypes in response to phosphorus and water stress under field conditions. Agronomy, 11: 28, 2021.

ALLEN, R. G. et al. Evapotranspiration del cultivo: guias para la determinación de los requerimientos de agua de los cultivos. Roma: FAO, 2006. 298 p. (Estudio Riego e Drenaje Paper, 56).

AYALA, C. C. et al. Growth, biomass distribution, gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in cowpea ('Vigna unguiculata'(L.) Walp.) under drought conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 14: 371-381, 2020.

BANGAR, P. et al. Morphophysiological and biochemical response of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] varieties at different developmental stages under drought stress. Turkish Journal of Biology, 43: 58-69, 2019.

BASTOS, E. A. et al. Evapotranspiração e coeficiente de cultivo do feijão-caupi no Vale do Gurguéia, Piauí. Irriga, 13: 182-190, 2008.

ELHADY, S. A. A. et al. Hydrogen peroxide supplementation in irrigation water alleviates drought stress and boosts growth and productivity of potato plants. Sustainability, 13: 899, 2021.

EZIN, V. et al. Adaptation of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to water deficit during vegetative and reproductive phases using physiological and agronomic characters. International Journal of Agronomy, 2021: 1-12, 2021.

FANG, X. et al. Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61: 335-345, 2010.

FAROOQ, M. et al. Integration of seed priming and biochar application improves drought tolerance in cowpea. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 40: 1972-1980, 2021.

GAO, T. M. et al. Cytological, genetic, and proteomic analysis of a sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) mutant Siyl-1 with yellow-green leaf color. Genes & Genomics, 42: 25-39, 2020.

GLOSER, V. et al. Early changes in nitrate uptake and assimilation under drought in relation to transpiration. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11: 602065, 2020.

GNANKAMBARY, K. et al. Assessment of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) mutant lines for drought tolerance. International Journal of Agronomy, 2020: 1-9, 2020.

KIM, D. et al. Use of structurally-accurate 3D plant models for estimating light interception and photosynthesis of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) plants. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 177: 105689, 2020.

MCMURTRIE, R. E.; NÄSHOLM, T. Quantifying the contribution of mass flow to nitrogen acquisition by an individual plant root. New Phytologist, 218: 119-130, 2018.

MELO, F. B. et al. Recomendação de adubação e calagem para o feijão-caupi na região Meio-Norte do Brasil, Teresina, PI: EMBRAPA MEIO-NORTE, 2018. 8 p. (Comunicado Técnico, 249).

MIRANDA, R. D. S. et al. Selection of soybean and cowpea cultivars with superior performance under drought using growth and biochemical aspects. Plants, 12: 3134, 2023.

MUNJONJI, L.; AYISI, K. K. Leaf gas exchange and δ13C in cowpea and triticale under water stress and well-watered conditions. Heliyon, 7: e07060, 2021.

NUNES, C. et al. Cowpea physiological responses to terminal drought - Comparison between four landraces and a commercial variety. Plants, 11: 593, 2022.

OLORUNWA, O. J.; SHI, A.; BARICKMAN, T. C. Varying drought stress induces morpho-physiological changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) genotypes inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Plant Stress, 2: 100033, 2021.

PEREIRA, L. D. S. et al. Watermelon yield and efficiency of use of water and nitrogen. Revista Caatinga, 32: 769-777, 2019.

PEREIRA, L. S. et al. Intermittence in irrigation management and nitrogen optimize yield and water use efficiency in baby lettuce. Spanish Journal of Agricultural, 21: 13, 2023.

SANTOS H. G.et al. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 3. ed, Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2013. 353 p.

SANTOS, R. et al. Root and agro-morphological traits performance in cowpea under drought stress. Agronomy, 10: 1604, 2020.

SELEIMAN, M. F. et al. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants, 10: 259, 2021.

SILVA JÚNIOR, J. S. D. et al. Production performance of BRS Tumucumaque cowpea under different plant densities and water regimes. Revista Caatinga, 33: 205-216, 2020.

SILVA, J. D. S. et al. Mechanisms of tolerance to water deficit and physiological responses to rehydration in cowpea. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 52: 1-10, 2021.

SMART, R. E.; BINGHAM, G. E. Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology, 53: 258-260, 1974.

WAHAB, A. et al. Plants’ physio-biochemical and phyto-hormonal responses to alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress: A comprehensive review. Plants, 11: 1620, 2022.

WASAYA, A. et al. Evaluation of fourteen bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by observing gas exchange parameters, relative water and chlorophyll content, and yield attributes under drought stress. Sustainability, 13: 4799, 2021.

ZHUANG, J. et al. Drought stress strengthens the link between chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic traits. PeerJ, 8: e10046, 2020.

Downloads

Published

17-03-2026

Issue

Section

Scientific Article